Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 37/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 85/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.22/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
963K
130K
Completed sessions
1,452,502
3,509,476
Token share
1.88%
0.27%
Tokens
17T-42%
2.4T+100%
AUG 8OCT 2
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56.1%92K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba MiniLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba LargeLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Jamba Large